Il documento in questione parla di molte cose e iniziare da un estratto preso dal mezzo non e’ certo un buon inizio, ma non resisto: e’ il cuore del Web2.0 se vogliamo e della rivoluzione che pian piano di soppiatto avremo nei prossimi anni nel Web…
Una cosa che ho gia’ accennato, il famoso Web of data, o Open Data….

Web users are becoming increasingly more savvy, and they have begun to recognise that their ongoing contributions in whatever form, e.g. product reviews, are an important success factor for these businesses.
In short, users are coming to recognise that they are providing data for free, so why should it be locked into that site alone?
**After Open Source, Open Data
**
The growing desire for web users to maintain ownership of their data, plus the increasing willingness for businesses to share their data to benefit from the network effects that web services can engender can be seen as a natural second wave of “open-ness”.
First open source; now open data

This second wave has the potential to be a much bigger and profound movement as it is of immediate relevance to all frequent web users, rather than just software engineers, hackers, businesses, etc.

The pressure for information to be free, is translating into pressure for sites to expose open services for users to interact with.
Similar pressures are leading to standardisation of data formats; web services alone aren’t enough the data must be portable and easily exchangeable. XML and RDF are both core technologies that facilitate this exchange, with specific vocabularies, such as FOAF (description of users) and RSS (syndication of content) addressing particular needs.

Questo e’ proprio uno dei passaggi chiave per capire la direzione che conviene prendere per rendere le applicazioni Web piu’ evolute e cosi’ anche l’esperienza Web stessa…
Per non parlare che creando un sub-strato RDF si crea anche quel livello fondamentale sul quale poggia la visione del Semantic Web…

Con un solo approccio si potrebbero avere ben due vantaggi, uno immediato e uno nel tempo…

Passiamo ora a vedere di cosa si parla in questo paper…

I’ve seen TiddlyWiki some months ago, and the idea and the non-linear written capacity has impressed me so much…

A TiddlyWiki is like a blog because it’s divided up into neat little chunks, but it encourages you to read it by hyperlinking rather than sequentially: if you like, a non-linear blog analogue that binds the individual microcontent items into a cohesive whole.

From Kemitix.net :

A self-contained HTML file that is a Wiki.
Editing the file locally it rewrites itself on disk as you save changes. There are a number of customisations that people have done to it, including one to use it hosted on a server.
I’ve been quite content with the basic Tiddler.
It is a wonderful demonstration of what you can do with javascript and a web browser, as if GMail and Google Maps weren’t good enough examples.

Or from another point of view, “The world as I see it“:

Ignore the silly name and focus in on the fact that this is a handy little wiki that can function like your own localized Wikipedia. And it’s totally portable, which means you can store it on a keydrive, email to yourself, whatever you want.
A very interesting tool, IMHO…

Another description from inolleb.com:

As it mentions, it is a single html file that contains everything you need. You then create tiddlers using WikiWords.
Tiddlers are blocks of information that link to other blocks of information and the links can continue infinately.
Ultimately it is extremely hard to describe. You will just have to check it out for yourself.

Per qualche tempo ci sara’ del lavoro in corso in questo blog, soprattutto per quanto riguarda la sua parte “semantica”…

Cambiamenti sottili, ma non visibili al primo sguardo…

Dopo tanto parlare, e dopo averci riflettuto parecchio ho scelto la mia via per gestire i tags locali usando RDF… e in realta’ l’approccio in questione e’ l’unione di diverse vie: il bello dello sperimentare e’ proprio questo,no?

Rispetto al modulo delle tassonomie RSS e a come identificare i tags alla fine sono giunto alla conclusione di creare una mia folksonomy ( o tassonomia personale ) partendo dalla situazione attuale…
Dai tags gia’ presenti creare tags con ID univoci, elemento base per poi lavorare con RDF.

La loro struttura adesso e’ questa:

http://dagoneye.it/knows/taxonomy#TAG

Ho preso spunto dalla taxonomy creata da Norman Walsh, anche se per ora ho creato solo i nodi soggetto:
penso di creare una pagina apposta che lavori in RDF che mi aiuti a gestire la tassonomia, con i sinonimi e il resto… usando OWL magari..
Queste sono le intenzioni nel medio periodo almeno…

Per i curiosi basta che vi scarichiate il feed RDF del blog per vedere le modifiche…

-> Feed RDF